Tag Archives: Start Own Business

Affective Leadership Development Workshop Demonstration to be Conducted on February 15th, 2013.

For Immediate Release

Performance Transformation, LLC™ and community advocacy group Lead With Giants will host an experiential demonstration for the proprietary Affective Leadership Development workshop at SMART from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on February 15th, 2013.

Leadership Workshop Round Pen 1 lo resJan. 17, 2013 – Performance Transformation, LLC™ (Venice, FL) announced today it will conduct a complementary, experiential demonstration of its new workshop, “Affective Leadership Development” on February 15, 2013 in Bradenton, FL.  The workshop demo is being sponsored by Lead With Giants and hosted by the Sarasota Manatee Association for Riding Therapy (SMART).

Affective Leadership is a mindful approach to engaging, guiding, and motivating human beings to perform at their optimal capacity.  The approach employs insights garnered from peer-reviewed research from affective neuroscience, social neuroscience, performance psychology, emotional intelligence, applied behavioral economics and creative thinking.

“Affective Leadership is first about understanding the emotional and psychological affect we have on those we lead, simply by showing up,” said Terry Murray, Managing Parter of Performance Transformation (http://www.performtransform.com).  ”Are we congruent and consistent in what we say, what we do, and how we are being present?  How we act and interact has a biochemical and neurological impact on everyone we encounter.”

Leadership Round Pen 2 lo resMr. Murray goes on to add, “Second, it is about leading with empathy.  People that lead with authenticity, compassion and vulnerability are powerfully engaging. Research from more than a half dozen scientific disciplines clearly demonstrates the biological response people have to both positive and negative emotional stimuli.  This response either triggers engagement and creative thinking or disengagement and apathy.  In today’s Ideas Economy, leading with compassion drives profitable growth.”

 Lead With Giants (http://leadwithgiants.com) is a community organization founded by Dan Forbes in Sarasota, Florida.  The group focuses on supporting and expanding leadership throughout the community.  Dan is also a Financial Advisor with Merrill Lynch Wealth Management in Sarasota.

SMART (http://smartriders.org) is a 501(c)(3), Therapeutic Riding Facility serving children with developmental disabilities in the Sarasota/Manatee community for over 25 years. SMART and Performance Transformation partner to conduct personal and professional development workshops employing Equine Facilitated Experiential Learning.

Leadership Round Pen lo res“We’re thrilled to be working with Gail Clifton, her wonderful team and the exceptional herd of horses at SMART,” commented Terry.  ”We love the business model. By partnering with SMART, a significant percentage of our clients’ investment in workshops goes to support programs for children with special needs.  It’s a win/win/win.”

Affective Leadership evolved out of Performance Transformation’s original program, Transformational Leadership.  The approach represents more than four years of research, development and validation.  The work is grounded by more than two decades of real-world leadership experience.

“When we view the world through the lens of empathy, clarity emerges,” said Terry.  ”Empathy is an under utilized learning tool in our culture.  It enables us to learn through the experiences of others.  It allows us to engage.  If we think about it, out of all the creatures born on this Earth, humans are the most vulnerable at birth.  We were born to be cared for; and neurologically and biochemically, we evolved to care for others.”

Terry and Kana - Hawaii“The first step is to recognize our own conditioning.  Our culture and institutions influence our natural orientation.  Our workshops enable participants to gently strip away that veneer and begin to cultivate self-awareness and social awareness. From there we can impart the skills of self-regulation and relationship management.  The ground-based, experiential exercises with the horses has proven to be a remarkable accelerant for this process.”

The importance of empathy is recognized by thought leaders in other fields as well.  David Kelly, the founder of design firm IDEO, helped usher in a process called Design Thinking.  Design Thinking began as an approach to industrial design that centered around empathy; a deep understanding of the human experience and the interaction design has with that experience.  The approach was heralded by Steve Jobs and Apple, contributing the Apple Experience to many of their breakthrough products.  The Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford is now the epicenter of this thinking and approach which has expanded to include social initiatives.

 Leadership Round Pen 3 lo res“We quite literally, and quite recently, stumbled across Mr. Kelly’s work and the Design Thinking approach being taught at Stanford,” said Terry.  ”It’s validating. Philosophically, we’re in remarkable alignment, and, to a certain extent, what we do could accurately be referred to as Design Leadership.”

 The event is complementary.  To register, please call (941) 485-7428.

Time:  3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., February 15, 2013.

Where:  SMART, 4640 C.R. 675, Bradenton, FL

© 2013, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

1 Comment

Filed under Leadership

Small Business and the Social Fabric of Community

Key Concept ~ Small businesses provide employment, yes, but mindful entrepreneurs contribute to their communities in many other ways, too.  Performance Transformation partners with nonprofit therapeutic riding centers to deliver personal and professional development programs that contribute to the financial sustainability of our charitable partners while strengthening the fabric of the community.

Yesterday, we had the privilege of spending the morning with teachers and administrators from the nonprofit Just For Girls Academy.  The new charter school will serve at-risk, young girls from the Sarasota/Manatee area of Southwest Florida.  The school, led by CEO Becky Canesse and Principal Dr. Jennifer Rosenboom, is incorporating Equine Facilitated Experiential Learning into their core curriculum.  The ongoing program will be conducted at SMART (the Sarasota Manatee Association for Riding Therapy, a community nonprofit that has been serving children with developmental disabilities for twenty-five years.  The objective of the program is to cultivate empathy and emotional intelligence skills as part of what Becky Canesse refers to as, “Teaching the whole child”.

Research clearly demonstrates, a person’s level of emotional intelligence contributes to 80% of our success in life, with the remaining 20% driven by our cognitive abilities.  Working with the horses elevates the children’s self-awareness, self regulation, social awareness and relationship management skills as well as cultivating empathy and respect for other sentient beings.  By focusing on cultivating empathy, the school hopes to sidestep many of the bullying issues that have become so prevalent in our society.

What we find so exciting is we’re creating very innovative for profit/nonprofit partnerships that will contribute to the strength of the community and quality of life for at-risk girls for years to come.  In fact, the work actually resonates multi-generationally, helping to open up new horizons that disadvantaged young people may have never seen otherwise.

If you’d like to learn more about yesterday’s events you’re welcome to read the full story about our work in today’s Bradenton Herald.  I also encourage you to visit and generously support the Just For Girls Academy and SMART organizations.  Both nonprofits do incredible work for our most vulnerable citizens.

© 2012, Terry Murray.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Leadership, Random Thoughts

Speak with Author Terry Murray Live on Patricia Raskin’s Positive Business™ Radio Show

For Immediate Release

Entrepreneur, Author, and Business Strategy Architect Terry Murray will be appearing live on Patricia Raskin’s nationally syndicated, call-in radio program, Positive Business™, Friday, July 13th at 3:00 p.m., E.D.T.

Terry Murray, author of “The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success”, is scheduled for a live interview with renowned radio talk show host Patricia Raskin, Friday, July 13th, at 3:00 p.m., E.D.T.

“I’ve done many radio interviews, but this will be the first live show with callers participating in the conversation.” commented Mr. Murray.  ”It should be a lot of fun!”

Terry’s book provides a step-by-step approach for creating and sustaining breakthrough performance in today’s volatile world.  Looking beyond conventional wisdom, Terry re-examines his entrepreneurial experiences to examine the human elements that consistently drive creativity, innovation and success.  The book was recently cited in the March, 2012 edition of the academic Journal For Economic Literature.

“We’re well past the Industrial Age, and in fact we’ve moved beyond the Information Age.  We now live in the Idea Age,” adds Terry.  ”In today’s global economy, intellectual property is the driver of value creation.  The source of commercially viable ideas are people.  Highly engaged, talented, passionate people.  Human beings, and our remarkably creative and adaptive abilities, are the raw material for business in the 21st century.  The traditional, Industrial Age approach to leadership, strategy and organizational culture must also evolve in parallel with this evolutionary shift.”

Listeners are welcome to call into the show at (888) 345-0790.  The program is syndicated throughout the United States and will stream live at http://www.790business.com.

Ms. Raskin has interviewed more nearly 2,000 guests on her show.  Her past guests include such luminaries as Dr. Mehmet Oz, Maya Angelou, Gay Hendricks, Debbie Ford and Dr. Andrew Weil.  In addition, she has written over 700 newspaper articles and produced and hosted 500 television programs and documentaries.

A podcast of the program will be posted on Terry’s blog site shortly after airing.

© 2012, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Associate Engagement, Leadership, Media & Interviews

Cultivating and Sustaining a Creative, Organizational Culture, Part II

Key Concept ~ Here’s part two of a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur”, exploring a mindful approach to cultivating the right organizational culture for today’s Idea Economy.

~ Reaping What Has Been Sown

Businesses have a difficult time addressing things they cannot measure, yet there are real costs associated with these veiled issues.  The greatest hidden cost that erodes organizational performance is employee disengagement.  Gallup®, Inc. has been measuring employee engagement levels since the beginning of the decade and reports on these surveys in the Gallup Management Journal.  The study indicates 29% of employees in America are engaged (meaning they work with passion, energy, and are emotionally connected to their organization), 56% of employees are not engaged (meaning they are physically present but do not work with passion or energy), and 15% are actively disengaged (meaning they actually are working at cross purpose with their fellow associates).  The study estimates the annual, aggregate cost of employee disengagement is anywhere between $237 and $270 billion in lost productivity.

  A recent study published in the Harvard Business Review® indicates that during what is now termed The Great Recession the percentage of actively disengaged employees has skyrocketed to 21%!

If we extrapolate these findings into a small business environment (even using the conservative numbers from Gallop), say one with twenty employees and payroll of $1 million, the impact of employee engagement becomes strikingly tangible.

In this scenario we can anticipate six employees are activity engaged, eleven are sleepwalking through their day, and three are actively working to undermine the company’s mission.  If we give the sleepwalkers the benefit of the doubt, that they’re perhaps contributing at 50% of their capabilities, we can assume that at a minimum, $425,000 of our million dollar payroll is providing no return on investment whatsoever.  This doesn’t take into account the value the actively disengaged employees are actually destroying through their efforts beyond the lost wages we are paying them.  Conversely, we are only enjoying a full return on investment on thirty percent of our annual payroll through our associates that are actively and passionately engaged with the mission!

Thankfully, the intentions and congruent actions of authentic leadership can re-engage many of the sleepwalkers by cultivating an atmosphere of trust and inclusion.

The fifteen  to twenty-one percent that are working to undermine their fellow associates simply need to go.  Their participation in the enterprise frustrates passionate associates and serves to foment further disengagement with the sleepwalkers. This is a great example of addition through subtraction.

Creating a shift in culture to one of trust and engagement begins with authenticity; the suspension of managerial ego in the daily interaction of the business.  Altruistic intentions combined with congruent actions resonates positive energy and engages associates to be fully present and contributory.  A genuine concern for the well being of associates that is consistently expressed will ignite the collective consciousness of a fully present team.

You’d be surprised how quickly leadership can turn around associate disengagement.  In the 1990’s I was working as the Vice President of International Marketing for a major medical device company.  My responsibilities brought me into close and frequent contact with the European managing directors for each country we operated in throughout the continent.  Moral was very low as the corporation historically had operated as a classic U.S. exporter into the region.  Products, services, pricing, and business methods were not tailored for the individual cultures and markets.  Everything was developed and dictated from the U.S. corporate office.  This situation was exacerbated by a veritable turnstile of senior management being assigned from the states that was not sensitive to the various cultural and operational nuances that existed country to country and quite often within the nation states themselves.

The first thing I did as the new Vice President was to begin listening to the concerns of the managing directors and repositioning our portfolio to more closely align with their particular business needs.  This quickly escalated into my advocating with corporate the need to begin manufacturing products in Europe for Europeans and to expand our services within each market.  The European associates began to witness my actions matching my words and a new found faith in the future of the organization began to emerge.  For the first time in years the European associates began to feel the company aligning with their interests, markets, and corresponding opportunities for career success.

Within a few short months I found myself promoted to Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.  Not only was I faced with the challenge of relating to a wide spectrum of cultural perspectives but I was also twenty years younger than all of my direct reports (European hierarchies tend to move much slower than U.S. companies when it comes to promotions).  With my new level of authority I began empowering the managing directors to conduct business in the manner that best suited their opportunities and constraints.  I knew I had secured their trust when my managing director for Eastern Europe and the Middle East, Thanassis Bouzabardis, spoke up during a business dinner in Madrid with all of the managing directors, “Terry, I think I can speak for all of the directors when I tell you we don’t view you as another American coming here to manage our business…we view you as a fellow European.”

To this day I feel that was one of the greatest complements I’ve ever received regarding my leadership style and abilities.  By listening, expressing authentic empathy for their environments, and acting congruently I began shifting the culture of the business from a place of poor morale to re-engaging the European associates.  All of this took place within six short months.  The European team also increased sales by more than $16 million in that same timeframe!

Early stage companies have the advantage of starting with a relatively blank slate.  Enlightened hiring practices will attract enlightened talent.  Authentic leadership will attract authenticity.  Sharing the Vision during the hiring process will help in this regard as will following one’s intuition.

The compensation plan offered to new hires can also weed out people simply looking for immediate gratification versus people in search of being a part of something more meaningful and of greater significance in their lives.  The compensation package can reveal if a person is looking for remuneration based solely on their perceived individual value or if they are willing to work for a reasonable, competitive wage buoyed by incentives derived through team value creation and the tangible contribution of achieving shared goals.

The courage of visionary conviction will not miss out on what may appear to be the minimum talent threshold necessary for performance.  It will, in fact, reveal human beings capable of continuous growth and cooperation.  Fully engaged, eclectically talented associates,  build the creative bandwidth necessary for adaptive problem solving along the way.

Existing organizations are faced with a more challenging task in the cultivation of positive, collective consciousness.  It cannot be achieved overnight, but through the application of authenticity and consistent, conscious leadership it can happen in a surprisingly short period of time as my experience in Europe proved.  The expression of empathy combined with the vibrant cultivation of trust can rehabilitate the most disengaged workforce in a few short months.

Supported by honest accountability, starting with self-accountability, a conscious leader will begin to engage associates that have developed conditioned behaviors of self-preservation that dilute creative contribution.  The onus is on the leader to reach out and begin to display and communicate their dedication to the well being of each individual on the team.  Leadership that chooses to serve the team as a primary approach towards serving the business.

to be continued…

© 2011-2012, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Associate Engagement, Customer Engagement, Leadership

Cultivating and Sustaining a Conscious, Creative Organizational Culture ~ Part I

Key Concept ~ I’d like to share a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success”, that explore the nuanced challenge of cultivating a vibrant, inclusive organizational culture in today’s volatile world.

The most enlightened vision, the most elegant strategy requires the positive energy of a team in continuous alignment with the actions and intentions of aligned purpose.  In today’s world, where value creation emerges from intellectual property, human beings have never been more central to success.  The business community is slowly evolving in their understanding of the importance of human beings as the drivers of sustainable performance.

This is reflected in the jargon.  What were once Personnel Departments became Human Resources, and HR is now evolving towards Talent Management.  While this line of thinking shows promise there often still exists a disconnection between posturing and jargon and the actions of leadership.

This slow march still leaves many organizations far from embracing the complex, nuanced, and multi-dimensional nature of human beings.  We are much more than an amalgamation of our cognitive abilities, education, and accumulation of experiences.  And yet, for the most part, that’s exactly the criteria most commonly associated with recruitment and hiring.

The fact is, there is something accretive about our very nature.  A fully actualized human being represents a sum that is greater than his or her individual attributes, talents, experiences, and education.  There is something beyond this mere accounting, something mysterious and beautiful.  Something that sparks the creativity that lies within us all!

Our ability to connect, engage, and authentically motivate others emerges through our emotional competencies, often referred to as emotional intelligence.    This refers to our self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, and relationship management skills.  Research reveals that more than 80% of success in life can be attributed to the level of emotional self mastery that emerges through the development of these abilities.  The remaining 20% relates to our native intelligence and cognitive abilities.

Perhaps the single most important sensor-connector in the human experience (and one critical to effective leadership) is our ability to express empathy.      Again, an ability that emerges through our emotional attunement.  Contemporary business culture tends to ask us to leave our emotions at home.  Yet, in doing so, they are disconnecting us from our very nature.  Leaving our hearts on the sidelines disengages us from both our employers and our authentic selves.

This leads us to consider the mysterious source of human creativity.  What is the source of inspiration in human beings?  I venture to say it emerges from a place far beyond the mere components of our physical existence.  There is something Divine in our ability to create.  Something that relates to our accretive nature, of how our mind, heart, and spirit intertwine and create the essence of our being.  To compartmentalize our gifts, to ask us for one while discounting another leaves us fragmented, less than what we are meant to be.

As I write this IBM® just released their 2010 Global CEO Study.  In canvasing more than 1,500 CEOs from around the world, a revelation came to light.  According to these business leaders, the single most important leadership competency necessary for success in the future is creativity.  Not managerial discipline, mental rigor, integrity, or vision…but creativity.  They go on to identify the solution to this challenge lies in cultivating creativity throughout the entire organization.  This is a hopeful sign.  An acknowledgement that the driver of success going forward must embrace the creative nature of human beings.

Unfortunately, the mindset in today’s workplace is often one of fear.  Fear from leadership to acknowledge our authentic nature.  Fear with associates to take risks with positive intention.  Fear based in a lack of trust and the insecurities rooted in ego-driven behavior.

The historical lack of commitment from many businesses towards associates has instilled an incessant, negative expectation.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop.   Leading associates to hedge their emotional and energetic contributions, protecting their themselves by projecting a false façade.  Managers defend territory and take issues personally.  Doesn’t feel like a creative place, does it?

Fortunately, it is not imperative to speak of the authentic nature of humans to acknowledge, embrace, and cultivate the creative potential of human beings.  However, in many environments, a conscious break in the perspective and behavior of leadership needs to occur for creativity to emerge.  Creativity is tough to manufacture…it needs to be cultivated.  I think you can see how it takes a different mindset and perspective to spark a creative environment.

The philosophy of winning at any cost has become deeply rooted in many corporate settings.  The attitude of if we’re not growing, we’re dying has always befuddled me to a certain degree.  I’m not speaking of small, growing businesses trying to build traction or mid-size companies moving quickly to leverage capabilities.  I mean some of the really large businesses I’ve worked for in the past.  Growth tells one part of the story, but I’ve seen some areas where less would have been more, both in the near term and strategically for the organization.  Moving forward isn’t always a linear process.

Be smart here.  Learn to measure your steps towards progress in the tangible motion of the business.  Are you positioning your talent, capabilities, and culture in a position poised for adaptability?  This is what the CEOs in the survey are concerned about…finding the creative thinkers that can navigate this new horizon.

to be continued…

© 2011 – 2012, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Leadership

Understanding the Real Cost of Field Sales Professionals

Key Concept ~ Congratulations!  You’ve reached sufficient traction in your burgeoning business to hire your first field sales team.  You know it’s an expensive move, but a necessary step in the scaling of your business.  But are you sure of what the real costs are of deploying field sales teams?  Here are some insights from a project I did a few years ago that shed some well needed light on field sales, and the critical nature of mindfully leading your investment.

Several years ago, I was consulting on business strategy with a custom sales company called SalesForce4Hire®, LLC.  I worked with them to help develop something we called Sales Prototyping®.  Every company in the world prototypes a product before bringing it into production and the market, but rarely, if ever, did we witness companies prototyping their sales process.  The company’s focus is primarily in the medical device space, so a typical sales launch from a traditional company would put upwards of 28 sales reps in the field to launch a new device.  This provides ample coverage of the key population centers, and associated physicians and hospitals, around the country.  This also represents an investment of around $5 million per year!

As we were refining our strategy, positioning and value proposition, I dug into the research to try to determine the true, albeit hidden cost, of field sales personnel in the industry.  As I waded through the research, I was astonished at the inefficiencies that exists in many sales organizations.  Two things immediately jumped off the pages of the research.  First, industrial, business-to-business sales representatives take a lot of office days.  With technology being what it is today, this, to me at least, seemed excessive.  The second issue was how much time was wasted in sales meetings.  Again, with the online meeting capabilities combined with the mobility enabled by smart phones and tablets, this seemed excessive.  Between the two, 98 days a year are spent out of the field!  That’s twenty work weeks out of the year or 40% of the available selling days per annum (including a two week vacation, but not including holidays).  Forty percent of the company’s investment of $5 million for their sales team is $2 million!

So out of the 132 remaining sales days, how much time do field sales representatives actually spend in face-to-face selling time?  According to the research, the typical field sales rep is spending somewhere between two and three hours a day actually selling to prospects (and let’s hope they’re true prospects).  This is primarily due to poor planning resulting in excessive windshield time.  You’d think with the 78 days of office time taken, sales reps would be more efficient once they got their butts out the door.  What we’re left with is somewhere between 33 and 50, eight hour days, of face-to-face selling time for a typical field deployed, industrial sales representative, per annum.

Now, let’s get down to the brass tacks of the real cost of field sales.  I’m going to use a fully burdened, annual cost per sales rep of $100,000 per year (this is conservative in many industries, as the annual cost can easily run upwards of $120,000 to $140,000 per year, depending on the geography and industry).  At the end of the day, the cost of face-to-face selling time for many companies is running somewhere between $250 and $380 per selling hour.  And you thought your attorney was expensive!

I realize a portion of this burdened expense is performance based, and thus variable, but it is critical, especially for a first time entrepreneur, to fully understand the significance of the investment they’re making in field sales professionals.  Please keep in mind, these figures reflect fully engaged sales professionals.  Rarely have I met a sales person that wasn’t ready to jump ship for greener pastures, and the employee disengagement numbers are simply dismal today (for a detailed analysis on the misalignment of employees today, please visit Igniting Creativity in Business).

The point we brought to the surface through this investigation is you had better have a really solid sales launch plan in place before you decide to deploy a field sales team.  We were also able to make a strong case for our value proposition.  Without a finely honed, well targeted plan, you may find your sales acquisition costs are exceeding your profitability.

© 2012, Terry Murray.

SaleForce4Hire and Sales Prototyping are registered trademarks and servicemarks of McGeever©, LLC.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Sales

Terry Murray Discusses the Strategic Imperative of Creative Thinking in Business on the CBS Radio Network

The need for creative thinking has moved well out of R&D and marketing departments.  The speed and dynamics of today’s economic world require adaptive solutions to unprecedented challenges at every touch point within the organization.  I recently had the opportunity to discuss how to go about cultivating the type of organizational agility successful companies require in the 21st century with Walt Shaw on the CBS Radio Network.

You’re welcome to listen to the interview on the player below:


© 2012, Terry Murray.

© 2012, CBS Radio Network.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Associate Engagement, Leadership, Media & Interviews, Productivity, Random Thoughts, Strategic Planning

Why Small Firms Can Win the Coming Talent War

Key Concept ~ I read an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal the other day that revealed a remarkable level of stupidity being practiced in business.  In the article, Software Screening Rejects Job Seekers, Wharton School professor of management and human resources Peter Cappelli shared his insights into the jobs market and the implications today’s hiring procedures have on attracting and recruiting talent.

We’re hearing it all the time now.  Companies are continuously complaining that they can’t find the talent they need to fill open jobs.  Professor Cappelli decided to look into this situation and came up with the following conclusion; “The real culprits are the employers themselves”.  While the recession empowered employers to be exceptionally picky in their selection of job applicants another factor is at play; screening software is now used by major corporations in the hiring process.  Once again we see corporations running to technology to attempt to solve a human-centric challenge…looking out there for the solutions to today’s competitive challenges rather than being a bit more self-reflective and looking within for the answers.  And simply put, it doesn’t work.

In his upcoming book, “Why Good People Can’t Get Jobs”, Professor Cappelli reveals some striking examples of just how dysfunctional the hiring process has become.  One HR executive told him that, just as an experiment, he anonymously applied for an opening in his company.  He didn’t get through the computer screening process.  In addition, he witnessed managers piling on requirements to the point that nearly nobody on the planet would meet their expectations.  Another example of the mind-numbing stupidity being played out in corporate hiring environments is a company that received 25,000 applications for a basic engineering job.  The HR department reported that no qualified job seekers applied for the position.  Really?  One engineer reported that he was told that his background was perfect except for one thing; his last title didn’t match the title of the position in the company. A title which was unique to that company.  Worst of all, the vast majority of job seekers never have the opportunity to engage with a human being in the application process.

Now, for many, many years I’ve witnessed the hiring process being driven by risk-aversion.  Companies tend to hire the person that is least likely to fail rather than the one that is most likely to succeed.  It’s the equivalent of playing not to lose, rather than playing to win.  But what we’re seeing now makes that behavior look remarkably progressive.  The professor also points to the need for greater investments in education and training, on the part of the employers, to meet their shifting needs.  The mindful investment in human beings is mission critical in today’s economy.  Organizations must become learning organizations. in order to stay competitive.

While this trend is bad news for job seekers, it is excellent news for small, entrepreneurial firms.  The myopic approach of large companies is missing out on great talent simply because they didn’t formulate their resume with the proper keywords.  This is another example of the Industrial Age mindset still dominating Corporate America.  People are more than their resume.  Character, creativity, inter-personal skills and emotional intelligence are difficult to communicate on a one page resume.  These intangibles, that are proven to be the key drivers of success, are only revealed through relationship.  By meeting, or at the very least, speaking with a potential candidate.

Big companies have long enjoyed intrinsic advantages over smaller competitors.  This remarkable misstep opens the door to a more level playing field.  In the 21st century, talent will be the deciding factor on who wins and who loses.

© 2012, Terry Murray.

4 Comments

Filed under Leadership, Productivity, Random Thoughts

Crowd Funding Considerations

Key Concept ~ President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act into law the other day.  The Securities and Exchange Commission has 270 days to comment and advise on the new statute, so it will be interesting to see how they weigh in on this legislation.  While this may hold exceptional promise for many aspiring entrepreneurs, there are a few things you should consider before you secure this type of funding.

Last November I wrote a blog entitled, The Crowd Funding Conundrum, as the JOBS Act came to the house floor.  The legislation is designed to open up crowd funding for equity investments.  The bill waives the accredited investor requirements of the SEC ($250,000 per year income for three consecutive years or $2 million in net worth, excluding primary home asset) as well as the need for Private Placement Memorandums and many of the other controls and reporting requirements so familiar to the private equity world.  While the buzz is really starting to hum on the internet, entrepreneurs that have never gone down the private equity road would be well advised to understand the potential repercussions crowd funding can have on later-stage financing rounds, accounting expenses, reporting requirements, etc.

The bill caps the small investor’s sum at $2,000 and allows for up to $1 million in financing annually.  Here are some things you may wish to consider prior to going down the crowd funding path.

Shareholder Communications ~ Are you prepared and structured to consistently and uniformly address 500, 1,000 or 2,000 shareholders’ concerns?  You’ll need to be ready to do so.  Most entrepreneurs never see how much time a CEO spends on investor relations.  If you don’t have an investor communications strategy, and the capabilities to execute on it, this one area alone could quickly swamp your time.

Legal Structure ~ Are you an LLC?  An S-Corp?  A C-Corp?  Be sure you understand the differences in legal entity structure.  An LLC is not readily designed for investors and are state-regulated entities.  As such, the interstate reporting requirements, if investors are involved from around the country, are substantial.  An S-Corporation also is not designed for broad investment.  If you’re going to pursue equity investors, you really should be doing so as a C-Corporation.  Keep in mind, if you’re accustomed to doing business as an LLC, this will be a major change for you.

Company Pre-Cash Valuation ~ Do you know what your company is worth?  Pre-cash valuation is just that, the value of the company before it is driving cash flow or received equity financing.  This is highly speculative and requires some insights into early-stage growth, barriers to entry, competitive response, and time line to break-even.  Missing the mark on pre-cash valuation can have terrible repercussions on your liquidity event.  A down round (a subsequent round of equity financing in with the per share value has gone down from the previous round of funding) is the death nell to larger, more sophisticated investors.

Dilution ~ If you’re going for equity financing you’ll soon understand the implications of dilution.  This also has strong ties back to the pre-cash valuation.  Equity financing is the sale of a percentage of ownership in your business.  With each subsequent round, you will become more and more diluted in your ownership position.  Give up too much ownership (because you didn’t have an accurate pre-cash valuation) early and by the time the company is at scale you’ll have very little ownership left in hand.

Defensible Intellectual Property ~ Is your firm intellectual property (I.P.) based?  Is your I.P. protected by solid, defensible patents?  Are you prepared to reveal your trade secrets in open, crowd sourcing venues?  The investors will want to know what is special about your firm.  Even Angel Investors and VCs don’t sign non-disclosures.  How are you going to manage sensitive, competitive information as you seek out funding?

Due Diligence ~ The due diligence process in traditional, private equity funding is intense and extensive.  Don’t think you can sidestep the proper preparation you will need to conduct even with crowd funding.  Eventually you’ll want to go to the more traditional suppliers of equity financing and you’ll need to have this ready.

Entanglements ~ Want to kill a deal on arrival in the Private Equity world?  Show up with shareholder legal entanglements.  Crowd funding opens the door for possible conflicts from every direction.  I’m not saying crowd funding will lead to entanglements that will derail later stage rounds, but it will certainly elevate the probability of entanglements and conflict to emerge.  Remember, the crowd isn’t nearly as astute, experienced, and sophisticated as an accredited investor.

Exit Strategy ~ Equity investors get in to get out.  Working with a small group of Angel Funds helps align interests and expectations as to when the next round of funding will occur.  This is the liquidity event the investors are seeking.  What will be the objectives of 500, 1,000 or 2,000 individual investors?  How will you align them?

Expertise ~ One of the least talked about value of traditional private equity investors is the resource they represent, both through their expertise and networks.  If you go down the crowd funding path you will not get this additional support and guidance that can be key to an early stage company’s survival.

This is just a start of the conversation you should be having prior to considering crowd funding.  Here’s a great article on the new law from the Wall Street Journal that had some great advise and comments.  It also has a link to the full PDF copy of the JOBS Act you can download.

© 2012, Terry Murray.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Getting Started, Random Thoughts, Strategic Planning

The Strategic Imperative of Inclusive, Creative Organizational Culture

Key Concept ~ In our series on the three key elements for accelerating successful startups, here’s the third in a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success”.  (Note:  A special thanks to my readers for your patience in the the updates on this blog site.  The team’s been in Missouri for the past ten days conducting a series of training exercises with psychologists from the VA and with local veterans to launch Warriors in Transition in the Southeast Missouri community).

~ Creative Culture

While leadership is paramount in orchestrating the creative visualization of an enlightened strategic planning process, it is the propagation of culture that will carry an organization forward to scalable heights (or lows; it cuts both ways) that resonate far beyond a single personality.  It is much like the relationship between a gardener and their garden.  The gardener may be capable of inspirational work, but it is the garden that inspires.

The traditional definition of organizational culture is the shared values, norms, artifacts, and embraced behaviors of an enterprise.  This is a somewhat superficial definition that historically has proven to poorly serve leaders attempting to drive performance or organizational change.  At best, it places culture at the periphery of the company, as if it is a side effect of the mission.  At worst, by referring to culture as an artifact, it infers that the culture is a coincidental by-product or relic of the organization.

In reality, culture is the vibrational resonance of the collective consciousness of the organization.  This immediately changes the way we think about culture.  It is no longer a by-product of what a company does but a powerful force that affects everything and everybody involved in the business.  The frequency of cultural energy is self-generating and perpetually regenerating.  When we drop a pebble into a pool we cannot alter the ripples that move continuously outward without disrupting the entire pool.  It is leadership’s role to drop the appropriate pebbles, at the appropriate time, knowing the resonance will expand beyond their immediate control.

For nearly a decade working as a strategic consultant with life science and medical device start-up enterprises I began to notice a common challenge shared by these companies.  The vast majority of these companies emerge from intellectual property cultivated in academic settings.  As these companies are formed they bring along members of the research staff and are often lead by a scientist, physician, or engineer that first developed the technology in their laboratory.  It is an exciting time reflecting the natural progression of organizational evolution, but this progression requires substantive, adaptive change at the very heart of the enterprise.

Unwittingly, these entrepreneurs bring along the academic culture from whence they came.  The culture that was ideal for the nurturing and early cultivation of their intellectual property is ironically very poorly suited for the business environment they are attempting to enter.  This is exacerbated by the nature of their technology and the critical demands of customers, regulators, and investors in the health care and pharmaceutical research markets.  The mission has changed (moving from creating technology to commercializing technology) yet the emerging organization clings to their historical culture, usually quite unaware of the risk this is about to introduce to the nascent company.

I’ve observed that these start-up companies are often unaware of the imperative need to quickly migrate from an academic culture to that of a business oriented culture.  This naiveté is a leading contributor of failure in early stage companies.  It is not the technology that fails; it is leadership’s inability to recognize the significance of culture and the fundamental importance of creating and cultivating the culture necessary to meet the high expectations of their target marketplace.

But why is this?  These are quite often remarkably gifted intellectuals capable of remarkable discoveries, insights, and performance.  It is a facet of business dogma that culture is a by-product of artifacts, shared values, and attitudes rather than the actual energy of the collective consciousness of the organization.  It is not peripheral; it is concentric to the very essence of the organization.

The academic culture to which they cling isn’t bad; it is just as it should be in the early, creative stages of intellectual property.  It simply no longer resonates with the frequency the evolving organization needs to successfully connect with customers in a commercial environment.  The very nature of the enterprise has evolved and it is leadership’s responsibility to anticipate and ignite the new energy and intention necessary to fulfill this new mission.

One of the reasons culture may be perceived as an allusive, almost amorphous issue may be due to the fact that it is rarely discussed during the early stages of company creation.  There are so many urgent and demanding issues organizations face as they struggle to establish traction and stability in the marketplace.  Culture always seems to take a back seat in development.  From my experience, it is only when culture becomes a problem that there is a conscious effort to address the situation.  By that time it is like trying to turn around an aircraft carrier traversing the Suez Canal.  The constraints of the business make it a formidable task that no one wants to get in front of in order to resolve.

Another reason business culture tends to take on a seemingly uncontrolled life of its own is the lack of focus on culture in the development and execution of the strategic plan.  It simply isn’t a traditional core focus of senior management and it can be a difficult area to measure in an objective manner.  Perhaps industrial companies operating in the twentieth century could get away with ignoring this strategic imperative, but contemporary enterprises leveraging intellectual property for value creation can no longer afford to avoid the importance of culture.

The propagation of a creative, healthy culture begins with the expressed intention of authentic leadership.  Associates take their cue from the words and behaviors of their executives.  If leadership expresses a predatory, win at all cost philosophy, the behaviors of the organization will follow suit.  Nowhere is the old adage of reaping what one sows more accurately reflected than in the creation of organizational culture.  When associates buy-in to the vision, intention, and strategy, a corresponding, positive energy begins to resonate throughout a business.  As a business grows in size, the outer bands of this energy are subject to the laws of inertia.  A body at rest tends to stay at rest and a body in motion tends to stay in motion.  This is why culture demands attention early in the developmental stages of a business.  Once the initial, framing forces are unleashed they are very difficult to modulate.

The traditional definition of culture references shared values; this warrants a bit more discussion.  Culture is affected by the shared, living values of an organization.  There are two types of living values in a company; explicit shared values and implicit shared values.

Explicit values are best reflected through thoughtfully crafted Vision Statements and Mission Statements.  These formal articulations define who we are and where we’re going.  Unfortunately, these formal statements are often another area of peripheral focus, especially in emerging organizations (we’ll discuss creating powerful Vision and Mission Statements in detail in Chapter Six).  Explicit values are also reinforced through the language and focus expressed in standard operating procedures.  This emphasizes how we will act in the daily conduct of our business; how we will treat our customers and stakeholders and resonate with the sense of responsibility we have to those working around us.

Explicit values are almost always highly positive in their intention but they can be dramatically tempered by the implicit values of an organization.  These are the unwritten rules of a company and these unspoken values are capable of derailing the finest intentions.

Implicit values often emerge from ego and therefore are frequently based in fear, insecurity, and the desire to perpetuate positions of power.  Unwritten rules can cover a wide spectrum of acceptable and non-acceptable behaviors in a company.  Expectations of dress, informal lines of communication throughout the hierarchy, subtle power influencers, and the evaluation criteria of performance are prime examples.  I’ve even experienced environments where the exercising of vested stock options was perceived to be a career killer by senior management!  This certainly wasn’t written anywhere, but it was clearly understood by everyone.

The example we’ve probably all experienced at one time or another is the existence of a good ole’ boy network in a company.  The existence of such cliques are, by definition, exclusive, rather than inclusive.  They disenfranchise talented associates and propagate office politics.  Such cliques often display passive-aggressive behaviors that exist only to serve the ego and selfish desires of individuals in an organization.

The consistent display of authentic leadership helps ensure the alignment of implicit values with organizational intention.  This makes sense as authentic leadership is not rooted in the ego.  Authentic leadership also cultivates empathy throughout the culture, a powerful and binding force of positive intention.  We’ll explore this in more detail in Chapter Eight.

It is impossible to parse out any one of the three key attributes of transformational performance.  They are all intertwined in the tapestry of the organization and require continuous attention over time.  With these concepts as our backdrop we can now begin to discuss the step-by-step process to transform your organization or lay the right foundation for your startup endeavor!

© Terry Murray, 2012.

2 Comments

Filed under Associate Engagement, Customer Engagement, Productivity