Tag Archives: Organizational Development

Cultivating and Sustaining a Creative, Organizational Culture, Part II

Key Concept ~ Here’s part two of a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur”, exploring a mindful approach to cultivating the right organizational culture for today’s Idea Economy.

~ Reaping What Has Been Sown

Businesses have a difficult time addressing things they cannot measure, yet there are real costs associated with these veiled issues.  The greatest hidden cost that erodes organizational performance is employee disengagement.  Gallup®, Inc. has been measuring employee engagement levels since the beginning of the decade and reports on these surveys in the Gallup Management Journal.  The study indicates 29% of employees in America are engaged (meaning they work with passion, energy, and are emotionally connected to their organization), 56% of employees are not engaged (meaning they are physically present but do not work with passion or energy), and 15% are actively disengaged (meaning they actually are working at cross purpose with their fellow associates).  The study estimates the annual, aggregate cost of employee disengagement is anywhere between $237 and $270 billion in lost productivity.

  A recent study published in the Harvard Business Review® indicates that during what is now termed The Great Recession the percentage of actively disengaged employees has skyrocketed to 21%!

If we extrapolate these findings into a small business environment (even using the conservative numbers from Gallop), say one with twenty employees and payroll of $1 million, the impact of employee engagement becomes strikingly tangible.

In this scenario we can anticipate six employees are activity engaged, eleven are sleepwalking through their day, and three are actively working to undermine the company’s mission.  If we give the sleepwalkers the benefit of the doubt, that they’re perhaps contributing at 50% of their capabilities, we can assume that at a minimum, $425,000 of our million dollar payroll is providing no return on investment whatsoever.  This doesn’t take into account the value the actively disengaged employees are actually destroying through their efforts beyond the lost wages we are paying them.  Conversely, we are only enjoying a full return on investment on thirty percent of our annual payroll through our associates that are actively and passionately engaged with the mission!

Thankfully, the intentions and congruent actions of authentic leadership can re-engage many of the sleepwalkers by cultivating an atmosphere of trust and inclusion.

The fifteen  to twenty-one percent that are working to undermine their fellow associates simply need to go.  Their participation in the enterprise frustrates passionate associates and serves to foment further disengagement with the sleepwalkers. This is a great example of addition through subtraction.

Creating a shift in culture to one of trust and engagement begins with authenticity; the suspension of managerial ego in the daily interaction of the business.  Altruistic intentions combined with congruent actions resonates positive energy and engages associates to be fully present and contributory.  A genuine concern for the well being of associates that is consistently expressed will ignite the collective consciousness of a fully present team.

You’d be surprised how quickly leadership can turn around associate disengagement.  In the 1990’s I was working as the Vice President of International Marketing for a major medical device company.  My responsibilities brought me into close and frequent contact with the European managing directors for each country we operated in throughout the continent.  Moral was very low as the corporation historically had operated as a classic U.S. exporter into the region.  Products, services, pricing, and business methods were not tailored for the individual cultures and markets.  Everything was developed and dictated from the U.S. corporate office.  This situation was exacerbated by a veritable turnstile of senior management being assigned from the states that was not sensitive to the various cultural and operational nuances that existed country to country and quite often within the nation states themselves.

The first thing I did as the new Vice President was to begin listening to the concerns of the managing directors and repositioning our portfolio to more closely align with their particular business needs.  This quickly escalated into my advocating with corporate the need to begin manufacturing products in Europe for Europeans and to expand our services within each market.  The European associates began to witness my actions matching my words and a new found faith in the future of the organization began to emerge.  For the first time in years the European associates began to feel the company aligning with their interests, markets, and corresponding opportunities for career success.

Within a few short months I found myself promoted to Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.  Not only was I faced with the challenge of relating to a wide spectrum of cultural perspectives but I was also twenty years younger than all of my direct reports (European hierarchies tend to move much slower than U.S. companies when it comes to promotions).  With my new level of authority I began empowering the managing directors to conduct business in the manner that best suited their opportunities and constraints.  I knew I had secured their trust when my managing director for Eastern Europe and the Middle East, Thanassis Bouzabardis, spoke up during a business dinner in Madrid with all of the managing directors, “Terry, I think I can speak for all of the directors when I tell you we don’t view you as another American coming here to manage our business…we view you as a fellow European.”

To this day I feel that was one of the greatest complements I’ve ever received regarding my leadership style and abilities.  By listening, expressing authentic empathy for their environments, and acting congruently I began shifting the culture of the business from a place of poor morale to re-engaging the European associates.  All of this took place within six short months.  The European team also increased sales by more than $16 million in that same timeframe!

Early stage companies have the advantage of starting with a relatively blank slate.  Enlightened hiring practices will attract enlightened talent.  Authentic leadership will attract authenticity.  Sharing the Vision during the hiring process will help in this regard as will following one’s intuition.

The compensation plan offered to new hires can also weed out people simply looking for immediate gratification versus people in search of being a part of something more meaningful and of greater significance in their lives.  The compensation package can reveal if a person is looking for remuneration based solely on their perceived individual value or if they are willing to work for a reasonable, competitive wage buoyed by incentives derived through team value creation and the tangible contribution of achieving shared goals.

The courage of visionary conviction will not miss out on what may appear to be the minimum talent threshold necessary for performance.  It will, in fact, reveal human beings capable of continuous growth and cooperation.  Fully engaged, eclectically talented associates,  build the creative bandwidth necessary for adaptive problem solving along the way.

Existing organizations are faced with a more challenging task in the cultivation of positive, collective consciousness.  It cannot be achieved overnight, but through the application of authenticity and consistent, conscious leadership it can happen in a surprisingly short period of time as my experience in Europe proved.  The expression of empathy combined with the vibrant cultivation of trust can rehabilitate the most disengaged workforce in a few short months.

Supported by honest accountability, starting with self-accountability, a conscious leader will begin to engage associates that have developed conditioned behaviors of self-preservation that dilute creative contribution.  The onus is on the leader to reach out and begin to display and communicate their dedication to the well being of each individual on the team.  Leadership that chooses to serve the team as a primary approach towards serving the business.

to be continued…

© 2011-2012, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Associate Engagement, Customer Engagement, Leadership

Cultivating and Sustaining a Conscious, Creative Organizational Culture ~ Part I

Key Concept ~ I’d like to share a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success”, that explore the nuanced challenge of cultivating a vibrant, inclusive organizational culture in today’s volatile world.

The most enlightened vision, the most elegant strategy requires the positive energy of a team in continuous alignment with the actions and intentions of aligned purpose.  In today’s world, where value creation emerges from intellectual property, human beings have never been more central to success.  The business community is slowly evolving in their understanding of the importance of human beings as the drivers of sustainable performance.

This is reflected in the jargon.  What were once Personnel Departments became Human Resources, and HR is now evolving towards Talent Management.  While this line of thinking shows promise there often still exists a disconnection between posturing and jargon and the actions of leadership.

This slow march still leaves many organizations far from embracing the complex, nuanced, and multi-dimensional nature of human beings.  We are much more than an amalgamation of our cognitive abilities, education, and accumulation of experiences.  And yet, for the most part, that’s exactly the criteria most commonly associated with recruitment and hiring.

The fact is, there is something accretive about our very nature.  A fully actualized human being represents a sum that is greater than his or her individual attributes, talents, experiences, and education.  There is something beyond this mere accounting, something mysterious and beautiful.  Something that sparks the creativity that lies within us all!

Our ability to connect, engage, and authentically motivate others emerges through our emotional competencies, often referred to as emotional intelligence.    This refers to our self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, and relationship management skills.  Research reveals that more than 80% of success in life can be attributed to the level of emotional self mastery that emerges through the development of these abilities.  The remaining 20% relates to our native intelligence and cognitive abilities.

Perhaps the single most important sensor-connector in the human experience (and one critical to effective leadership) is our ability to express empathy.      Again, an ability that emerges through our emotional attunement.  Contemporary business culture tends to ask us to leave our emotions at home.  Yet, in doing so, they are disconnecting us from our very nature.  Leaving our hearts on the sidelines disengages us from both our employers and our authentic selves.

This leads us to consider the mysterious source of human creativity.  What is the source of inspiration in human beings?  I venture to say it emerges from a place far beyond the mere components of our physical existence.  There is something Divine in our ability to create.  Something that relates to our accretive nature, of how our mind, heart, and spirit intertwine and create the essence of our being.  To compartmentalize our gifts, to ask us for one while discounting another leaves us fragmented, less than what we are meant to be.

As I write this IBM® just released their 2010 Global CEO Study.  In canvasing more than 1,500 CEOs from around the world, a revelation came to light.  According to these business leaders, the single most important leadership competency necessary for success in the future is creativity.  Not managerial discipline, mental rigor, integrity, or vision…but creativity.  They go on to identify the solution to this challenge lies in cultivating creativity throughout the entire organization.  This is a hopeful sign.  An acknowledgement that the driver of success going forward must embrace the creative nature of human beings.

Unfortunately, the mindset in today’s workplace is often one of fear.  Fear from leadership to acknowledge our authentic nature.  Fear with associates to take risks with positive intention.  Fear based in a lack of trust and the insecurities rooted in ego-driven behavior.

The historical lack of commitment from many businesses towards associates has instilled an incessant, negative expectation.  Waiting for the other shoe to drop.   Leading associates to hedge their emotional and energetic contributions, protecting their themselves by projecting a false façade.  Managers defend territory and take issues personally.  Doesn’t feel like a creative place, does it?

Fortunately, it is not imperative to speak of the authentic nature of humans to acknowledge, embrace, and cultivate the creative potential of human beings.  However, in many environments, a conscious break in the perspective and behavior of leadership needs to occur for creativity to emerge.  Creativity is tough to manufacture…it needs to be cultivated.  I think you can see how it takes a different mindset and perspective to spark a creative environment.

The philosophy of winning at any cost has become deeply rooted in many corporate settings.  The attitude of if we’re not growing, we’re dying has always befuddled me to a certain degree.  I’m not speaking of small, growing businesses trying to build traction or mid-size companies moving quickly to leverage capabilities.  I mean some of the really large businesses I’ve worked for in the past.  Growth tells one part of the story, but I’ve seen some areas where less would have been more, both in the near term and strategically for the organization.  Moving forward isn’t always a linear process.

Be smart here.  Learn to measure your steps towards progress in the tangible motion of the business.  Are you positioning your talent, capabilities, and culture in a position poised for adaptability?  This is what the CEOs in the survey are concerned about…finding the creative thinkers that can navigate this new horizon.

to be continued…

© 2011 – 2012, Performance Transformation, LLC™.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Leadership

The Strategic Imperative of Inclusive, Creative Organizational Culture

Key Concept ~ In our series on the three key elements for accelerating successful startups, here’s the third in a series of excerpts from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success”.  (Note:  A special thanks to my readers for your patience in the the updates on this blog site.  The team’s been in Missouri for the past ten days conducting a series of training exercises with psychologists from the VA and with local veterans to launch Warriors in Transition in the Southeast Missouri community).

~ Creative Culture

While leadership is paramount in orchestrating the creative visualization of an enlightened strategic planning process, it is the propagation of culture that will carry an organization forward to scalable heights (or lows; it cuts both ways) that resonate far beyond a single personality.  It is much like the relationship between a gardener and their garden.  The gardener may be capable of inspirational work, but it is the garden that inspires.

The traditional definition of organizational culture is the shared values, norms, artifacts, and embraced behaviors of an enterprise.  This is a somewhat superficial definition that historically has proven to poorly serve leaders attempting to drive performance or organizational change.  At best, it places culture at the periphery of the company, as if it is a side effect of the mission.  At worst, by referring to culture as an artifact, it infers that the culture is a coincidental by-product or relic of the organization.

In reality, culture is the vibrational resonance of the collective consciousness of the organization.  This immediately changes the way we think about culture.  It is no longer a by-product of what a company does but a powerful force that affects everything and everybody involved in the business.  The frequency of cultural energy is self-generating and perpetually regenerating.  When we drop a pebble into a pool we cannot alter the ripples that move continuously outward without disrupting the entire pool.  It is leadership’s role to drop the appropriate pebbles, at the appropriate time, knowing the resonance will expand beyond their immediate control.

For nearly a decade working as a strategic consultant with life science and medical device start-up enterprises I began to notice a common challenge shared by these companies.  The vast majority of these companies emerge from intellectual property cultivated in academic settings.  As these companies are formed they bring along members of the research staff and are often lead by a scientist, physician, or engineer that first developed the technology in their laboratory.  It is an exciting time reflecting the natural progression of organizational evolution, but this progression requires substantive, adaptive change at the very heart of the enterprise.

Unwittingly, these entrepreneurs bring along the academic culture from whence they came.  The culture that was ideal for the nurturing and early cultivation of their intellectual property is ironically very poorly suited for the business environment they are attempting to enter.  This is exacerbated by the nature of their technology and the critical demands of customers, regulators, and investors in the health care and pharmaceutical research markets.  The mission has changed (moving from creating technology to commercializing technology) yet the emerging organization clings to their historical culture, usually quite unaware of the risk this is about to introduce to the nascent company.

I’ve observed that these start-up companies are often unaware of the imperative need to quickly migrate from an academic culture to that of a business oriented culture.  This naiveté is a leading contributor of failure in early stage companies.  It is not the technology that fails; it is leadership’s inability to recognize the significance of culture and the fundamental importance of creating and cultivating the culture necessary to meet the high expectations of their target marketplace.

But why is this?  These are quite often remarkably gifted intellectuals capable of remarkable discoveries, insights, and performance.  It is a facet of business dogma that culture is a by-product of artifacts, shared values, and attitudes rather than the actual energy of the collective consciousness of the organization.  It is not peripheral; it is concentric to the very essence of the organization.

The academic culture to which they cling isn’t bad; it is just as it should be in the early, creative stages of intellectual property.  It simply no longer resonates with the frequency the evolving organization needs to successfully connect with customers in a commercial environment.  The very nature of the enterprise has evolved and it is leadership’s responsibility to anticipate and ignite the new energy and intention necessary to fulfill this new mission.

One of the reasons culture may be perceived as an allusive, almost amorphous issue may be due to the fact that it is rarely discussed during the early stages of company creation.  There are so many urgent and demanding issues organizations face as they struggle to establish traction and stability in the marketplace.  Culture always seems to take a back seat in development.  From my experience, it is only when culture becomes a problem that there is a conscious effort to address the situation.  By that time it is like trying to turn around an aircraft carrier traversing the Suez Canal.  The constraints of the business make it a formidable task that no one wants to get in front of in order to resolve.

Another reason business culture tends to take on a seemingly uncontrolled life of its own is the lack of focus on culture in the development and execution of the strategic plan.  It simply isn’t a traditional core focus of senior management and it can be a difficult area to measure in an objective manner.  Perhaps industrial companies operating in the twentieth century could get away with ignoring this strategic imperative, but contemporary enterprises leveraging intellectual property for value creation can no longer afford to avoid the importance of culture.

The propagation of a creative, healthy culture begins with the expressed intention of authentic leadership.  Associates take their cue from the words and behaviors of their executives.  If leadership expresses a predatory, win at all cost philosophy, the behaviors of the organization will follow suit.  Nowhere is the old adage of reaping what one sows more accurately reflected than in the creation of organizational culture.  When associates buy-in to the vision, intention, and strategy, a corresponding, positive energy begins to resonate throughout a business.  As a business grows in size, the outer bands of this energy are subject to the laws of inertia.  A body at rest tends to stay at rest and a body in motion tends to stay in motion.  This is why culture demands attention early in the developmental stages of a business.  Once the initial, framing forces are unleashed they are very difficult to modulate.

The traditional definition of culture references shared values; this warrants a bit more discussion.  Culture is affected by the shared, living values of an organization.  There are two types of living values in a company; explicit shared values and implicit shared values.

Explicit values are best reflected through thoughtfully crafted Vision Statements and Mission Statements.  These formal articulations define who we are and where we’re going.  Unfortunately, these formal statements are often another area of peripheral focus, especially in emerging organizations (we’ll discuss creating powerful Vision and Mission Statements in detail in Chapter Six).  Explicit values are also reinforced through the language and focus expressed in standard operating procedures.  This emphasizes how we will act in the daily conduct of our business; how we will treat our customers and stakeholders and resonate with the sense of responsibility we have to those working around us.

Explicit values are almost always highly positive in their intention but they can be dramatically tempered by the implicit values of an organization.  These are the unwritten rules of a company and these unspoken values are capable of derailing the finest intentions.

Implicit values often emerge from ego and therefore are frequently based in fear, insecurity, and the desire to perpetuate positions of power.  Unwritten rules can cover a wide spectrum of acceptable and non-acceptable behaviors in a company.  Expectations of dress, informal lines of communication throughout the hierarchy, subtle power influencers, and the evaluation criteria of performance are prime examples.  I’ve even experienced environments where the exercising of vested stock options was perceived to be a career killer by senior management!  This certainly wasn’t written anywhere, but it was clearly understood by everyone.

The example we’ve probably all experienced at one time or another is the existence of a good ole’ boy network in a company.  The existence of such cliques are, by definition, exclusive, rather than inclusive.  They disenfranchise talented associates and propagate office politics.  Such cliques often display passive-aggressive behaviors that exist only to serve the ego and selfish desires of individuals in an organization.

The consistent display of authentic leadership helps ensure the alignment of implicit values with organizational intention.  This makes sense as authentic leadership is not rooted in the ego.  Authentic leadership also cultivates empathy throughout the culture, a powerful and binding force of positive intention.  We’ll explore this in more detail in Chapter Eight.

It is impossible to parse out any one of the three key attributes of transformational performance.  They are all intertwined in the tapestry of the organization and require continuous attention over time.  With these concepts as our backdrop we can now begin to discuss the step-by-step process to transform your organization or lay the right foundation for your startup endeavor!

© Terry Murray, 2012.

2 Comments

Filed under Associate Engagement, Customer Engagement, Productivity

Innovative Organizational Structure For Creative, Entrepreneurial Technology Companies

Key Concept ~ How we structure the organization is a reflection of how we perceive function, and once established, how we function is highly influenced by our organizational structure.

I read an interesting article last week about the hyper-growth of internet technology companies in the Bay Area and the challenges they are having maintaining their creative cultures as their organizations grow. Even the most highly innovative entrepreneurial endeavors can fall back into old, hierarchical patterns as the demands of the organization flourish.

Here’s an excerpt from my book, “The Transformational Entrepreneur” that may offer a solution that is as innovative as the companies themselves!

While conducting market research in 2005 I became intrigued with the concept of convergence; of how biotechnology, information technology, and nanotechnology were coming together to create a new generation of products and capabilities. As I discovered compelling opportunities to converge companies with specific core competencies to create breakthrough technologies I also saw barriers that would challenge this vision. The barriers emerged from two areas; Company hierarchical structure resulting in silos that challenge internal coordination (never mind external convergence); and the intellectual horsepower of Ph.D.’s that were remarkably expert in their area of application but were no more insightful than a college science graduate in the complementary technologies. From an investor’s perspective, how could one converge the silos and create an environment of cross-pollination of the science and technology?

The answer came to me visually and was a bit of an epiphany…lay the silos down upon their sides and introduce structural, cultural, and operational porosity to the previously isolated silos. In effect, overlap and transform them into horizontal conduits of cooperative, customer-centric, developmental process drawn together by a surrounding conduit of leadership, finance, and shared operational infrastructure.

Copyright Terry Murray, 2011.

The seeds of thought for this new structural approach germinated while consulting with Kevin Schimelfenig, Founder and Managing Partner of SalesForce4Hire®, LLC. Kevin’s company provides custom sales solutions for medical device and life science organizations. The company creates custom business engines that can be absorbed or dissolved by the client and operates with a core management and talent team that expands and contracts in accordance with the needs of the current client mix. The core management team is highly cooperative and works together to move their clients’ projects through a proprietary commercialization process. The focus is on process flow and the company’s differentiating value highly depends upon the efficiency and speed of value creation. In effect, the process is driven through a value creating pipeline. This value conduit is highly porous operationally, absorbing contract resources as they are needed and releasing them upon conclusion of a project. SalesForce4Hire maniacally focuses on their core competencies and outsources everything else. There are no hierarchies or silos that could place a drag on value creation or introduce the risk of becoming distracted by non-value creating activities.

Interestingly, as I began refining the conduit structure business model I discovered, quite by accident, the root meaning of the word “conduit”. The word conduit originates from the Medieval Latin conductus, from the Latin, past participle of condūcere, meaning “to lead together”. Many people say there are no coincidences, and I couldn’t think of a more appropriate definition reflecting the intention of this approach to organizational structure!

The fact of the matter is, hierarchical structure is two dimensional…it reflects layers of authority across silos of functionality.  It does not reflect the human element so critical for success in today’s economy.  Such structures emerged out of the industrial age, when process, function, and control were the key drivers of success…not creativity.  Creativity flows from within; from within the great mystery that is the human spirit.  By adopting a new perspective on organizational structure, innovative companies can continue to cultivate their creative culture as they grow and flourish in the New Economy.

© Terry Murray, 2011. Excerpt from Chapter Nine of The Transformational Entrepreneur ~ Engaging The Mind, Heart, & Spirit For Breakthrough Business Success.

2 Comments

Filed under Associate Engagement, Customer Engagement, Leadership, Marketing, Productivity, Strategic Planning